I do feel like Section 21f is designed to help enhance the public school system but there are so many other factors that have to be considered. Who are the staff persons responsible for this implementation and change? Have the teachers had professional development on this system, method, policies and instruction? Who are designated resources for the students to ensure learning is occurring and properly given attention? These are questions I would like answered.
If a student wants to enroll in an online learning course and the school is not prepared to be of major support for that student then all of the guidelines in Section 21f that help the student with flexibility and educational choice can become void. The school that I am in that has a huge virtual learning/technology infused curriculum is currently working on making sure qualified individuals or a third party resource is available. One the schools I service, currently shares the IT person across all 6 schools within the district. How is this an advantage to the school? While they are doing well with infusing technology within the classroom there are also a lot of pitfalls when it comes to the technology itself and I envision the same with virtual schooling and the State School Act.
On the other hand, I know for sure that the other school I service is not equipped to handle these scenarios at all because they are still trying to gain access to more technology use. They aren't even as advanced as other schools when it comes to laptop carts and tablets. I have to be creative with my students to make sure that they are doing projects and activities that challenge them to grow using various tools and seeking out resources. Virtual schooling and the State School Aid Act is probably something they have yet to consider.

